Supabase vs Appwrite: Postgres perfection or docker drudgery? Freelancers, either way hire me on Upwork to save your sanity

A recent comparison of Supabase and Appwrite, two open-source Backend-as-a-Service platforms, highlights their differences in database philosophy, ease of use, and deployment options. Both platforms serve as alternatives to Firebase, offering authentication, databases, storage, and real-time capabilities. Supabase utilizes PostgreSQL with strong querying and row-level security, while Appwrite uses a MariaDB-based document-like API. As of 2026, Supabase has a more generous free tier with 100K monthly active users, while Appwrite offers 200K monthly active users and higher overall limits. With 97K GitHub stars, Supabase has a more vibrant community, while Appwrite has 55K stars and a fast community response. The choice between the two platforms depends on project requirements, with Supabase ideal for complex relational data and real-time features, and Appwrite suitable for privacy-focused projects and multi-language backends. Both platforms offer managed cloud services, with Supabase charging $25/month for its Pro plan and Appwrite offering similar pricing with higher limits.